
Gammage Goers - Alumnus
A panel of ASU Gammage theatregoers shares their opinions throughout the season.
Meet Pam

Pam
Where do you live? Scottsdale
Age: 62
Occupation: Theatre Arts Educator/Actress/Director
Marital Status? Married
Children and Grandchildren: No
Where did you grow up? Born in Manchester, N.H., raised in Methuen, MA., moved to Phoenix in 1961.
First Broadway show, and where you saw it: My folks used to take my brother and me to the North Shore Music Theater in Massachusetts. Two shows that stand out include DAMN YANKEES and GYPSY.
At what age did you see your first Broadway show? 9 years old
What is your favorite Broadway show? RAGTIME for its magnificent sweep and compelling story-telling. FIDDLER, CHORUS LINE, and SUNDAY IN THE PARK are close runners-up.
What are your hobbies? Inveterate reader with a bent toward historical fiction and biography.
A song and artist that speaks to you: Rodgers and Hammerstein’s “Cockeyed Optimist” from SOUTH PACIFIC describes my positive attitude.
Something Unique about yourself that defines you: “You bring order from a confused world” reads the silver-charm I received early in my teaching career. I cherish that compliment and believe it has informed my work as a teacher, director, actor and person! BTW, I still carry that charm on my key ring!
Video Profile:
Pam's Video Reviews
Pam's Written Reviews
-
AUGUST: OSAGE COUNTY
By Gammage Goer Pam
Reviewed on January 5, 2010
The holidays may be over, but experiencing this production is like finding a post-season gift for the Gammage theatre-goer. Hyped by rave reviews, coveted awards, star actor-turns and word-of-mouth buzz, audience expectations run high. And what to think about that three hour, twenty-minute running time? For all that sitting, should I wear my back brace or my elastic-waist pants? Does the show really need to run that long? Is the dramatic action sustainable? Can our expectations possibly be met? Yes. Almost Yes. And a resounding Yes again. Tracy Letts’ play is that compelling and director Anna D. Shapiro’s production is that powerful.By now you probably know that the play centers on the extended Weston family, a group that indeed manages to put the “fun” in “dysfunctional”. (There’s a helpful family tree in the playbill to assist us in sorting out relationships.) This is a big cast and the author is adept at writing both large scenes with the whole clan on stage, as well as intimate two-person scenes. The action moves with cinematic fluidity across the architecture of the three-story home that resembles a doll-house cutaway, aided by David Singer’s soulful bluesy-jazz score and Ann G. Writson’s tightly focused lighting.
Now, in this “well-made” three-act play with two intermissions (and when was the last time you experienced that with a new play??) the roots of American theatrical realism are strong: from LONG DAY’S JOURNEY INTO NIGHT, searing family drama. From CAT ON A HOT TIN ROOF, desperate confrontations. WHO’S AFRAID OF VIRGINIA WOOLF? gives us eviscerating comedy. There’s the sisterly bond of CRIMES OF THE HEART and BURIED CHILD’s enigmatic secrets. We recognize characters that remind of us Mary Tyrone, Big Daddy, George and Martha, Lenny, Meg and Babe, Dodge and Vince. These dramatic “echoes” are framed within the familiar topic of “The American Family” that has consumed so many of our best dramatists.
However, in the spirit of “everything old is new again”, playwright Letts manages to absorb this literary heritage to advance his own theatrical objectives, creating a modern epic of poisoned bodies, breaking hearts and dreams gone dry. And if Act III’s plotting starts to sprawl as wide as the Oklahoma plains or if we wander a bit too far for a bit too long from our protagonist Violet, well, we can cut the author a little slack. After all, how many of us used to find pleasure on a Sunday night viewing the wild and wooly Sopranos family opera? And we can be confident, I promise you, that Mr. Letts will bring the dramatic action to a satisfying…if not devastating…conclusion.
High praise for the acting company, a uniformly gifted ensemble that tears into this text with gusto, led by the American treasure Estelle Parsons. I’m hoping my Gammage-Goer colleagues will provide you with more actor details, though, because I’d like to concentrate on the work of the director, Anna D. Shapiro, who has staged this play with insight, flair and compassion.
Firstly, she has masterfully released her actors to discover the emotional life of each character, striking a balance between bombast and vulnerability and creating characters that are large enough in scale to fulfill Letts’ plot, yet specific enough in moment-to-moment action to make each authentically human.
Her story-telling is brilliantly paced, suggesting the violence and longing that lurk just below the surface, then allowing us to forget them with some choice comic pointing, and then ….Wham!...startling us when they unpredictably erupt.
Ms. Shapiro creates visually satisfying compositions on Todd Rosenthal’s nook-and-cranny-filled floor plan: the set doesn’t seem too big for the intimate scenes, nor do the crowd scenes seem scrunched. And, oh, I could have died and gone to Chekhov Heaven with her exquisite staging at the top of Act III!
Also impressive: her “second unit” work, i.e., the times a character is engaged in physical action on stage even when not in the scene being played. Watch especially Johnna (DeLanna Studi) working in the kitchen or reading in her third floor room, like a guardian angel of the Weston household overseeing events as they swirl uncontrollably below.
This production proves my “what makes good theatre” math theory: conflict + emotion + spectacle = entertainment. My students reading this will probably laugh to be reminded of this equation. I’ve been thinking of them as I prepare to teach a course in Modern Drama one final time before retiring for real. I have been inspired by this performance: in my love for the theatre, in my respect for its artists and in my awe of the power and joy of live theatre performance. It’s a fine way to feel about a career choice at the end of forty years!
I digress…Go see for yourself. And get back to me! I’ll be eager to hear what you think.
-
ALFRED HITCHCOCK’S THE 39 STEPS
by Gammage Goer Pam
Reviewed on April 20, 2010Clever…inventive…theatrical…farcical...audacious…and entertaining are some of the descriptors for ALFRED HITCHCOCK’S THE 39 STEPS, playing this week as part of the ASU Gammage Broadway Series. This production features all of the hallmarks of top-notch entertainment and delivers a piece that is as much a theatrical spoof of Hitchcock films as homage to them. There is the remarkably agile cast of four actors consisting of Ted Deasy in the male lead, Claire Brownell playing the three female romantic leads, and Eric Hissom and Scott Parkinson playing the remainder of the large cast of characters…male and female! Their stage actions are choreographed to within an inch of their lives and as an acting ensemble, they carry it off with panache. The Tony award-winning design team has created eye-popping spectacle: scenery, costumes, lights and music become almost extra characters, bringing a driving energy that supports the plot’s zany antics. And award-winning director Marie Aitken helms the production with a clear and consistent vision of concept and style.
The play is structured into short scenes, reflecting its cinematic roots. There is a decided vaudeville flavor to each that reminds us of the rhythms of the British Music Hall skits: set-up, punch line, double-take and blackout. And doors, lots of doors…rolling doors, spinning doors, opening doors, closing doors. One cleverly staged scene follows another and just when you think you’ve experienced all that the performers and stage wizardry can create, well, along comes yet another surprise to remind us how delightful theatrical magic can be. In fact, several times throughout the performance I thought that the production was as much a nod to that theatrical magic and inventiveness as it was to Hitchcock.
Attending 39 STEPS was a bit of a theatre-going departure for me. Often, I have some previous experience with a play. Either I’ve read it, seen it, taught it, performed it or directed it. This was different. I hadn’t read any reviews, though I recognized the title and knew of its Tony-award pedigree. My only other knowledge came from the pre-performance publicity that identified that a) four actors played the many roles and b) the comic style was in the mode of Monty Python…which, in the interest of full disclosure, I will confess is not quite my cup of tea. And to top it all off, I’ve never seen the original Hitchcock film! So I came to the performance with uncertain expectations but ready to surrender to the charms and entertainments the production would offer.
I did enjoy the production, though more from an appreciation of the artistry that created and performed it. Can there be an inherent danger in too much cleverness, even when brilliantly executed? When you mentally “oooh” and “aaah” over a particular stage technique or comic bit, does it keep you removed from the action of the play? In some plays, of course, this is the intent and perhaps it was here. After viewing the show, I was comparing it to my experience with THE LION KING, which had an equal number of magic and surprising moments, but which drew the viewer into the action. In 39 STEPS, for me, many scenes called attention to themselves and kept me as an outsider to any Hitchcockian-moments associated with a thriller/mystery. In short, the comic overwhelmed the thriller aspect of the title/plot or put another way, I wouldn’t have minded a little more Hitchcock with my Hitchcock.
Still, I would recommend this production as worthy escapist entertainment and the standing ovation given by the opening night audience attests to both their appreciation of the work and their good time. For this show’s theatricality, artistry and even audacity, I invite you to enjoy a performance of ALFRED HITCHCOCK’S THE 39 STEPS!




















